On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 01:15 +0000, Stewart Smith wrote: > As Jeff says, there was an attempt - and it didn't really work out... > > I also think that geographical representation on ctte would be flawed at > best. > > Perhaps a LUG Advisory Board (LAB) that chats with LA ctte at various > points (maybe every 2 or 3 months) to discuss various things? > > I think the regular dial-ins from LUG people to the LA ctte conf call > have been great, but perhaps doing it all en-masse will get larger > participation and cross group communication going. > > thougths? On a practical note, depending on how many people we get wanting to join in these teleconfs, it might be easier to hold the meetings via irc. Personally I find it easier to follow multiple irc conversations than spoken ones. And that despite having three kids. -- James Purser Ordinary Committee Member Linux Australia
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part