On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 06:57 +0800, Leon Brooks wrote: > I see the danger here not in LW replacing LCA, but in PHBs who might > otherwise channel sponsorship for LCA *thinking* of it as a replacement. Although, do remember that we have a very good relationship with our sponsors, and they totally understand what LCA is about. Also, we've typically had more sponsors wanting to sponsor LCA than can reasonably be accepted. I think they grok it enough that we're not going to loose any of them to a LW. I think it's a good sign of the health of Linux in AU when there is room for a LCA and a LW. It means that *everybody* (from upper management to on-the-ground techies) are taking it seriously. rock on. -- Stewart Smith (stewart@linux.org.au) Committee Member, Linux Australia
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part