[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Linux-aus] State representation on the board



On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 03:51:37AM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Anthony Towns">
> > Being on a list is fine and dandy; being in the core group, which has
> > access to all the information, and actually makes the decisions is best.
> > Failing that, having as easy access to someone in that situation as
> > possible is best.

> > The best person to coordinate Linux Australia's activities with people in
> > Queensland is someone in Queensland.

> That's why LUG involvement is so crucial. You can get the same benefit
> through very close cooperation and communication with LUGs -> thus the
> private lug@ list. Make use of it! (All of you!)

Well, no offense, but I really don't think that's the case, and I don't
really think people who are on the ctte, or members of SLUG are in a
great position to see the difference...

> > > I think you've just convinced me that regular summaries/newsletter type
> > > things are a Real Good Idea(tm) to keep the communication levels up.
> > PlanetLA?
> I'm actually setting up an Australian FOSS hackers and contributors planet
> site for LA, yes. :-)

Where's the best copy of spycyroll, anyway? The sourceforge page seem
not to have been updated for ages, but I thought both PlanetGnome and
PlanetDebian had made some interesting modifications (like the thumbnails,
if nothing else)...

(LUG aggregators are more interesting to me than an aggregator for all
of Australia)

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

               Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we can.
           http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature