[Linux-aus] Should Linux Australia change its name

[Noel Butler]

On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 12:20 +1000, Chris Neugebauer wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:46, Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote:
> >
> > So, you think that sponsors are NOT going to expect you explain who  <insert
> > some open source generalised name> organisation is?  You're kidding
> > yourself, come back,  reality needs you.
> 
> I don't expect that at all.  What I do expect is that I wouldn't have
> to explain that "The money is not going to Linux".  Obviously, I
> understand the difference between due diligence, and dealing with
> unfounded confusion.
> 


Then, as the risk of repeating myself, yet again, the only option you
have if you don't want to explain that, is to become your own legal
entity, because I can see you answering  "other" questions if not about
linux, about other things... and seriously
 how much effort is to explain it isn't going towards linux anyway? Far
far LESS I imagine than the 20 plus posts you have made arguing for a
name change I'm sure in this thread, especially when all you're doing is
saying the same thing, just worded differently each time.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/attachments/20120426/07a0b6e2/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/attachments/20120426/07a0b6e2/attachment.pgp