<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.28.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 12:20 +1000, Chris Neugebauer wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:46, Noel Butler <<A HREF="mailto:noel.butler@ausics.net">noel.butler@ausics.net</A>> wrote:
>
> So, you think that sponsors are NOT going to expect you explain who <insert
> some open source generalised name> organisation is? You're kidding
> yourself, come back, reality needs you.
I don't expect that at all. What I do expect is that I wouldn't have
to explain that "The money is not going to Linux". Obviously, I
understand the difference between due diligence, and dealing with
unfounded confusion.
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
Then, as the risk of repeating myself, yet again, the only option you have if you don't want to explain that, is to become your own legal entity, because I can see you answering "other" questions if not about linux, about other things... and seriously<BR>
how much effort is to explain it isn't going towards linux anyway? Far far LESS I imagine than the 20 plus posts you have made arguing for a name change I'm sure in this thread, especially when all you're doing is saying the same thing, just worded differently each time.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>