Re: [Linux-aus] State representation on the board

[Leon Brooks <leon@cyberknights.com.au>]

On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 02:34, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> I would like to see advisory sub-committees, such as a group of LUG
> leaders, a group of business leaders (you could call
> opensource.org.au and the proposed national business group an
> advisory sub-committee), government and education experts, etc., etc.
> That allows us to have a great committee from where ever, regional
> representation and special interest representation as the community
> and committee sees fit. Plus, you don't have to have a huge, unwieldy
> decision making core (the committee).

So would I. LA's rules seem kind of funny on that point. Sub-committees 
can be set up by Committee, but the victims dragooned onto them seem to 
become Clayton's Committee members by default, which could confuse 
things a bit.

Cheers; Leon

-- 
http://cyberknights.com.au/     Modern tools; traditional dedication
http://plug.linux.org.au/       Committee Member, Perth Linux User Group
http://slpwa.asn.au/            Committee Member, Linux Professionals WA
http://linux.org.au/            Committee Member, Linux Australia