On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 06:00:25AM +1100, Stewart Smith wrote: > On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 05:34, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > I would like to see advisory sub-committees, such as a group of LUG leaders, > Rock - this is what I was going to suggest when there was enough > interest and momentum for it to work (and people to do things). I think > we're actually getting there - and hopefully sometime this year it'll > actually start happenning, with people wanting to be part of these > advisoral sub-committees. Personally, I'm not particularly interested in being involved in an subctte that's just advisory. If you're going to do the work -- and communication with local groups is *the* core task of the LA ctte IMO; call it "enabling cooperation across Australia" if you want something that sounds more visiony -- then you should be the one making the decisions, and you should get the control. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we can. http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature