[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Linux-aus] State representation on the board: vision for LA



Living outside a capital city, and closer to NSW and Vic than Adelaide, I can see some weaknesses to the state rep argument. A rep in the capital 2.5 hrs away has less utility from my POV than an LA that is open and accessable via internet.

The idea that you have to cosy up to some local rep in real life to get the low down on LA activities seems more elitist and exclusionary to me than an LA which is run openly and which takes an active role communicating with its membership.

It seems to me that the desire for a local rep is partly
1 a serious desire for better representation
2 parochialism
3 issues with communication with the past and present LA

No argument with point 1. I just don't think it is a big deal personally. Experience, contributions, personality and platform are much more important than state of origin IMO.

I dismiss 2 outright. I am sick of state vs state stupidity. Every state has something different to contribute and its own proud achievements.

LA could perhaps lift its game on point 3, communication with membership. Accurate and easily accessable minutes, regular announcements to the list etc. As for getting matters raised with LA I am not sure a local member is going to be any more accessable or effective than emailing committee at linux.org.au.