[Linux-aus] Minutes of Council Meeting 03 June 2014

[Mark Ellem]

Exactly. While I see the benefits of LCA being peer-reviewed, I fear it 
could also affect barriers of entry. While it's always a task to create 
the right formula for a conf, going too far in formality could cause 
serious damage.

Mark.

On 14/06/14 23:30, Aguido Davis wrote:
>
> On 14 June 2014 16:31, Linux Australia Secretary 
> <secretary at linux.org.au <mailto:secretary at linux.org.au>> wrote:
>
>      *
>
>         Discussion of having linux.conf.au <http://linux.conf.au> made
>         a peer-reviewed conference, raised to Council by CHRISTOPHER
>         NEUGEBAUER representing personal correspondence
>         Council discussed some of the costs and benefits of making
>         linux.conf.au <http://linux.conf.au> a peer-reviewed
>         conference, including the additional effort and onus, and
>         whether it would have significant benefis in terms of
>         additional attendees.
>
>
> +1. as a denizen of an Australian university, i would like this very 
> much. of course, the devil is in the details.
>
> cheers,
>
> horatio
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-aus mailing list
> linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au
> http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/attachments/20140615/a49131b1/attachment.htm