[LC++]OS Programming
George T. Talbot
george at knucklehead.phat.com
Thu Sep 26 19:44:01 UTC 2002
I think it's tough to maintain a large C++ OS and API. I had read that
one of the things that kept BeOS from being the next Apple OS was the
"fragile base class problem". Apparently NEXT's OS, written in Objective
C didn't have that problem which is why they bought it.
http://2f.ru/holy-wars/fbc.html
--George
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Keith Schincke wrote:
> Atheos comes to mind as a C++ written OS. I have not heard about them in a
> year (maybe I was just working too much ;))
>
> This web site lists off a number of OSes and a few of them are in C++. I
> donno how fuctional they are. Atheos looked pretty good and was posix
> (mostly)
> http://tunes.org/Review/OSes.html
>
> Maybe they are just too hard to design.
>
> (the list seems to work a little)
>
>
--
_______________________________________________________________________
George T. Talbot <george at phat.com>
"It is amazing how complete is the delusion that beauty is goodness."
-Tolstoy
"They that can give up an essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
More information about the tuxCPProgramming
mailing list