[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [LC++]g++ 3.2 and C++ standards

To: tuxcpprogramming@lists.linux.org.au
Subject: Re: [LC++]g++ 3.2 and C++ standards
From: "Christian Beaudoin" <christ_beaudoin@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon Nov 11 12:32:02 2002
List-archive: <http://lists.linux.org.au/archives/tuxcpprogramming/>
List-help: <mailto:tuxcpprogramming-request@lists.linux.org.au?subject=help>
List-id: The Linux C++ Programming List <tuxcpprogramming.lists.linux.org.au>
List-post: <mailto:tuxcpprogramming@lists.linux.org.au>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/tuxcpprogramming>,<mailto:tuxcpprogramming-request@lists.linux.org.au?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/tuxcpprogramming>,<mailto:tuxcpprogramming-request@lists.linux.org.au?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: tuxcpprogramming@lists.linux.org.au
Sender: tuxcpprogramming-admin@lists.linux.org.au

Too, I would like that the Linux kernel 2.4.18 of RedHat 8.0 don't compile with gcc 3.2 but does with gcc 2.95.3.

I don't say that because one is better than the other. I just want to notice that in the case other ones would have the same problems.

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

Prev by Date: Re: [LC++]g++ 3.2 and C++ standards
Next by Date: [LC++]Why doesn't PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER work my constructor?
Previous by thread: Re: [LC++]g++ 3.2 and C++ standards
Next by thread: [LC++]functions return error nums: good practice?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread