Re: [LC++]g++ 3.2 and C++ standards

["Christian Beaudoin" <christ_beaudoin@hotmail.com>]

Hi,

Thank you for your answers.

I tried to compile my code with g++ 2.95.3 and it compiles very well !

I think it s not a question of bugs in gcc 3.2, but more a question of 
standards. In particular, they changes many things in the STL. They have 
thrown away the hash_map and the includes ending by ".h" don't work anymore.

I will continue working with the version 2.95.3 until the new standards are 
popular enough that the change be valuable.

  Christian






> From: "Christian Beaudoin" <christ_beaudoin@hotmail.com>
> Reply-To: tuxcpprogramming@lists.linux.org.au
> To: tuxcpprogramming@lists.linux.org.au
> Subject: [LC++]g++ 3.2 and C++ standards
> Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 00:37:41 -0500
>
> Hello,
>
> I  have a lot of code written for g++ 2.96 and above and that doesn't 
> compile anymore with the new version 3.2. In particular, I notice 
> significant changes in the STL.
>
> I'm not sure if it is a good idea to convert my code for it compile with 
> g++ 3.2 cause I want it to be standard with any platform. For example, I 
> would like it to compile with compilers like Borland and M.....ft.
>
>
> What is your suggestion ?
>
> Is there a real C++ standard ?
>
>   Christian Beaudoin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*  
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Linux C++ Programming List
> : http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/tuxcpprogramming List

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus