[LCP]static vs dynamic linking.

[Andrew Weaver]

What does the stack trace look like?

On Tuesday, May 06, 2003 3:16 PM, Rokicki, Andrew
[SMTP:ARokicki at US.TIAuto.com] wrote:
> Sorry I did mean -o no please don't guess.
> The code compiles fine as static or dynamic linking I added -Wall there is
> no warnings.
> But 
> When I run it with dynamic linking it runs fine.
> When I run it with static linking it gives me Segmentation fault.
> It is a multithreaded program using pthreads. 
> 
> PS. I don't think it is the moon since the program is misbehaving today
also
> ;)
> 
> 
> On Monday, May 05, 2003 7:20 PM, Greg Black [SMTP:gjb at gbch.net] wrote:
> > On 2003-05-05, Rokicki, Andrew wrote:
> > 
> > > When I link my code dynamically it works.
> > > something like this 
> > > $(TARGET) : $(OBJS)
> > >         $(CXX) -o $(TARGET) $(OBJS) $(LDFLAGS)
> > > 
> > > When i add -static it I get a Segmentation Fault.
> > > 
> > > $(TARGET) : $(OBJS)
> > >         $(CXX) -static o $(TARGET) $(OBJS) $(LDFLAGS)
> > > 
> > > I am using RH 8.0 with gcc 3.2.
> > > What am I missing ? 
> > 
> > The moon is in the wrong phase?  You left out the `-' in the
> > `-o' after `-static'?  There's a bug in your code?  You're using
> > C++ and expecting it to make sense?  How much would you like us
> > to guess?
> > 
> > -- 
> > Greg Black <gjb at gbch.net> <http://www.gbch.net/gjb.html>
> > GPG signed mail preferred; further information in headers.
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Linux C Programming List
> :  http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linuxcprogramming List