[Linux-aus] 4K monitor sizes
jason at mindsocket.com.au
Tue May 31 22:45:18 AEST 2022
I've tried dual monitors in the past and it just doesn't work for me as I
end up with a persistent sore neck. My preference is one monitor with as
many pixels as possible.
I was using a 32" 4k screen which died and struggled on whether I should go
with a larger, same, or smaller 4k. In the end I went with a 27" 4k and
it's sitting closer than the 32" - but possibly covering the same fov. A
larger screen just means it'd have to be positioned further back. Also note
that I don't have any eye issues and also do not use scaling. 27" had the
benefit of being cheaper and uses less power so that's a bonus.
Would I consider going larger again? Not really. The only thing I'd
consider is more pixels, I'd really like a 5k2k or more but there's not
many options plus they are crazy expensive.
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:33 PM Russell Coker via linux-aus <
linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au> wrote:
> Has anyone had experience with a monitor larger than 40" on their
> Currently Dell has a 27" USB-C monitor for $422 and a 32" monitor for $594
> while Kogan has a 43" for $799 and I'm thinking of what to buy in July.
> My wife's monitor broke and my plan is to buy myself a new monitor and
> her my Samsung 28" 4K monitor (which is higher spec than her previous
> USB-C monitors are ones that can supply USB-C power to a laptop while also
> having keyboard and mouse connected to the monitor as a USB hub. It's
> basically all the functionality of what used to be a laptop
> docking-station in
> a monitor with a single cable. It would be quite handy to have that
> functionality as a laptop with USB-C is on my shopping list too.
> According to the above article you want a TV to take up 30 degrees of
> but for a monitor it's probably a lot more as you focus on the window that
> needs your attention. Based on resolution and size according to that
> a 43" 4K "TV" would be best at a distance of 80-160cm with the minimum
> based on not seeing individual pixels. For a monitor you don't need to
> see pixels IMHO, just need to have enough of them to clearly represent
> letters. So maybe 43" would be a good size. It seems like a lot, but
> when I
> had a 17" monitor on my desk any larger than that seemed excessive...
> Another possibility is getting multiple monitors. For a long time I have
> unconvinced of the benefits of multiple monitors, but now I'm working at a
> company where there's a USB-C dock at every desk with 2 monitors and I've
> used to working with 2 monitors in addition to a laptop display. If I
> 2 of those 27" USB-C monitors I could have them both on my desktop system
> of the time and connect one to a laptop on occasion when I needed to.
> has really good support for dynamic plugging of monitors nowadays and
> gives me twice the pixels and 3/4 the area of a 32" monitor for about the
> My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/
> My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/
> linux-aus mailing list
> linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to
> linux-aus-unsubscribe at lists.linux.org.au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the linux-aus