[Linux-aus] Minutes of Council Face to Face, 8-9th March 2014, Hobart, Tasmania

[Joshua Hesketh]

Woops, typo. s/correspondence/accordance

On 10/04/14 22:58, Joshua Hesketh wrote:
> Hi Noel,
>
> I think you missed my point. If a complaint was raised in
> correspondence with the constitution the council would need to
> determine if it has jurisdiction, seeking advice if required, and act
> appropriately (within the constitution).
>
> Cheers,
> Josh
>
> On 10/04/14 22:45, Noel Butler wrote:
>>
>> You are trying to claim jurisdiction over what is entirely private
>> corro between two people who may just happen to be members of LA -
>> you can not do that, the first time you try "interfere" you may well
>> find yourself on the wrong end of the legal system - if someone
>> wanted to get narky.
>>
>> not to mention its the kinda thing only a communist dictatorship
>> regime would come up with.
>>
>>  
>>
>> On 09/04/2014 20:18, Joshua Hesketh wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Noel,
>>>
>>> We're not trying to assert that mail sent privately (after
>>> initiating from a list) should be made public or subject to certain
>>> restrictions. Simply this reinforces clauses 10, 11 and 12 of our
>>> constitution[0] that it may be cause for a complaint to be made
>>> about a member.
>>>
>>> I hope that helps.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Josh
>>>
>>> [0] http://linux.org.au/constitution#Resolution_of_disputes
>>>
>>> On 09/04/14 10:10, Noel Butler wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, but as one who has been on the receiving end of several
>>>> abusive private msgs related to things I have said on-list over the
>>>> times, even I know that you can not do this, private direct mail is
>>>> private and unrelated to LA.
>>>>
>>>> Before trying to assert yourself as god himself, you best obtain
>>>> "real" legal advice before contemplating anything like this, I have
>>>> seen an instance where a organisation tried this, and they were
>>>> slapped over in court, now it might have been in U.K., but since
>>>> our legal system is based on the westminster system still AFAIK,
>>>> expect much the same outcome here.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> On 08/04/2014 23:04, Linux Australia Secretary wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     DECISION: If a person is sending a mail privately, it is sent
>>>>     between two people, then a member can make a complaint about
>>>>     another member, and may result in mediation.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> linux-aus mailing list
>>>> linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au
>>>> http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus
>>
>>  
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-aus mailing list
>> linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au
>> http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-aus mailing list
> linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au
> http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/attachments/20140410/9f362fd0/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 901 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/attachments/20140410/9f362fd0/attachment.pgp