[Linux-aus] linux-aus Digest, Vol 70, Issue 4

[Anestis Kozakis]

On 3 January 2013 16:57, Paul Parker <paul2471 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Clearly the preparation of questions being asked needs further
> thought, before the next vote.
>
> IMHO  alternative answers need include "no-name change"  be be
> considered a valid choice in the list of names.
>
> Perhaps displayed as option:   "Linux Australia  (current name  with
> NO name change)"
>
> Skewing results to favor any change of name is perhaps even more unpopular.
>

Asking a simple Yes/No question is not skewing results in any way.  It's a
simple binary choice.  Either the majority votes for a name change, or they
don't.  No ambiguity.

And nice way to put what I wrote out of context by deleting everything
relevant before and after it.


> Paul
>

Anestis.


> From: Anestis Kozakis <kenosti at gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 15:50:55 +1100
> Subject: Re: [Linux-aus] Name change election results..
>
> ---deleted---
>
> The way the voting was done, it seems to have skewed the results a
> little bit in favour of no-name change by including it in the list of
> names.
>
> ---deleted---
>
-- 
Anestis Kozakis | kenosti at gmail.com | http://www.akozakis.id.au/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/attachments/20130103/89a4b641/attachment.htm