<div dir="ltr">On 3 January 2013 16:57, Paul Parker <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:paul2471@gmail.com" target="_blank">paul2471@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Clearly the preparation of questions being asked needs further<br>
thought, before the next vote.<br><br>
IMHO alternative answers need include "no-name change" be be<br>
considered a valid choice in the list of names.<br><br>
Perhaps displayed as option: "Linux Australia (current name with<br>
NO name change)"<br><br>
Skewing results to favor any change of name is perhaps even more unpopular.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>Asking a simple Yes/No question is not skewing results in any way. It's a simple binary choice. Either the majority votes for a name change, or they don't. No ambiguity.</div>
<div style><br></div><div style>And nice way to put what I wrote out of context by deleting everything relevant before and after it.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Paul<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>Anestis.</div><div style> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">From: Anestis Kozakis <<a href="mailto:kenosti@gmail.com">kenosti@gmail.com</a>><br>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 15:50:55 +1100<br>
Subject: Re: [Linux-aus] Name change election results..<br>
<br>
---deleted---<br>
<br>
The way the voting was done, it seems to have skewed the results a<br>
little bit in favour of no-name change by including it in the list of<br>
names.<br>
<br>
---deleted---<br></blockquote></div>-- <br>Anestis Kozakis | <a href="mailto:kenosti@gmail.com">kenosti@gmail.com</a> | <a href="http://www.akozakis.id.au/">http://www.akozakis.id.au/</a>
</div></div>