[Linux-aus] LA Name Change - the process
steve at nerdvana.org.au
Tue Jul 24 14:23:57 EST 2012
On 07/24/2012 01:30 PM, James Polley wrote:
> Compare this with the paperwork to create the Parent Organisation Not
> Called Linux Australia, then moving Linux Australia under PONCLA,
> shuffling bank accounts around to be owned by relevant orgs, creating
> new ones, making sure the audit trail is clear for LA getting seed
> funding from PONCLA for linux.conf.au <http://linux.conf.au>, but
> handing back 4 or 5 times
> that funding to the parent org when it's all done, and this argument
> doesn't really hold much weight.
> I'm not sure where this process came from. Why wouldn't we just be
> updating the name on our existing account?
Are you proposing that under the new scheme that each "sub committee" of
PONCLA won't even have a bank account? Ouch. I feel sorry for the PONCLA
My point is that you can't argue that creating a new entity and
absorbing other orgs already with their own bank accounts is less
paperwork than opening a new bank account for an ongoing event. I've
been there and done it for LA. Twice. It's not that hard, and not that
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the linux-aus