[Linux-aus] [LACTTE] Notes for Council Meeting 2010/02/17
me at cafuego.net
Mon Feb 22 13:32:49 EST 2010
----- "Steve Walsh" <steve at nerdvana.org.au> wrote:
> Peter Lieverdink wrote:
> > ----- "Andrew Ruthven" <andrew at etc.gen.nz> wrote:
> >> I've been suggesting this to everyone who will listen.
> So that fell down in that by the time the LCA2010 team needed access, it
> had been quite some time since they were in Australia, and could have
> visited a Westpac branch, gotten IDs, and signed all the necessary
> paperwork. Adding people to bank accounts with multiple signatories is
> a long and (partially necessary) convoluted process,and not something
> that can be done over the phone.
> > An account yes. Is there such a thing as "the" account? There wasn't
> > one for 08. Don't know about 09. 07 had one... perhaps the legacy one
> > is the 07 one.
> There is 1 (one) LCA account, that gets transferred from year to year.
> It was named LCA2007 in 2007, LCA2008 in 2008, and oddly enough,
> LCA2009 in 2009, which is the name it still has.
> Yes, the LCA2008 team did not get access to an account. That was the
> decision of one or two council members who wanted to see if it the team
> needed the access, or if the council could deal with all the banking.
> The result was: Yes, they needed access, and No, the council could not
> deal with all the banking, but the decision was reached far too late to
> be able to change the signatories without the risk of the change
> impacting on everything (mainly due to paperwork that was lost/missing
> with westpac).
> > Wouldn't it be relatively easy for the winning team to set up an
> > account at a *local* Westpac branch as soon as they know they've won
> > and have the relevant council members added shortly after the
> > election? When LCA is over and the finances are done, move what's left
> > back to the LA account and close that LCA account.
> > It's not as if the LA ctte necessarily need full access to the LCA
> > account. Just read-only is fine. All LA need to do is make sure the
> > LCA account has enough money in it to pay bills.
> In previous years there has been a transaction limit on the LCA account,
> so that transactions over a ceiling required one of the 4 token
> holders to sign off on. It wasn't because we didn't trust people, it was so
> that the council could undertake due diligence and governance, and be aware
> of, and sign off on, $40k leaving the conference account. I'm sure the
> LCA2009 team members that are on the list can advise if this requirement
> was onerous or not.
That's easy fixed by LA not putting $40k in that account if it doesn't need to go out ;-)
Even so, one or two LA council members can easily be added to an account set up by the winning LCA team. That's just a matter of filling out and signing the right papers and the LCA team taking them to their branch.
I'll add this to the next LA council agenda.
More information about the linux-aus