Janet Hawtin wrote: [snip]
It is yet another process which undermines Australian's rights to participate as valued individuals in their communities and yet again controls access in the interests of off shore proprietary interests. Its a recurring theme and a sad one.
"The Adelaide public meeting will be held at 3pm on Thursday 28 September, at the Disability Information and Resource Centre (DIRC), 195 Gilles St, Adelaide. "
Well perhaps it might be nice to make a valid ACS comment on the proposals?
I am sure we will once the proposals are documented.
Why they are not a part of a FOSS inclusive discussion on empowering NGO's and why they only recommend centrally brokered opportunities.
Why accreditation is the only option considered and open standards, good processes and transparent technologies are not a part of the dialogue?
indeed i agree and said so above.
Purpose and function are playing a second role to a predefined structure which benefits a few at the expense of wider community benefits.
i am not sure I understand this comment per se?
If I was to look for a way to have the IT sector represented either to NGO's or to government it would not be through so much fancy footwork or sleight of hand.
cheers brenda
-- Brenda Aynsley, FACS Chairman ACS SA http://www.acs.org.au/
The ACS Computer Professional Educational Program impacts on the Practising Computer Professional scheme. Visit http://www.acs.org.au/cpprogram/cpp.htm to see how.
Mobile:+61(0) 412 662 988 || Skype: callto://baynsley Phone:08 8357 8844 Fax:08 8272 7486 Nodephone:08 7127 0107 Oz Business Partners http://www.ozbusinesspartners.com/
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature