Re: [Linux-aus] Nomination for Ordinary Committee Members

[skribe <skribe@amber.com.au>]

On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 05:29, Jonathan Oxer wrote:
> Correct, but unless we wanted to go super-elitist ("you can't become a
> member unless you're identified by the Web of Trust" or similar) I
> can't see a simple way around that problem. 

I was attempting to point out that current situation for nominations (ie just 
email addresses) - given the current membership requirements - serve just as 
well as any other data provided.  Personally, I'd rather see nominations 
taken offlist with maybe weekly reports or an entirely separate list for 
them.  I understand the arguments for noms being on list, I just feel that 
personally the signal to noise ratio is too low. YKMV.

skribe
-- 
People seem to enjoy things more when they know a lot of other people
have been left out on the pleasure.
		-- Russell Baker

Xaraya Content Management Solutions http://www.xaraya.com/