On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 13:11 +1000, Jonathan Oxer wrote: > There is nothing particularly secret about them, they're probably just > not very interesting or relevant to anyone else and if they were all > posted to linux-aus it would just be noise as far as most people are > concerned. They probably wouldn't even make much sense to anyone else > since they're just extremely brief memory-prompters (often only a word > or two per topic) for the people that were there, and it would be a > total pain for AJ to have to write them up as coherent notes. The formal > meetings are of course a totally different story and AJ writes and posts > proper minutes for those. There is also, of course, the fact that we check the minutes before approving them, they have a draft process and AJ is careful to make sure they are a true representation (as are we all). notes aren't. they're notes - and we don't want inaccurate data going out. "notes from committee meeting" sounds too official, and there's a danger of misunderstanding. it's all about being overly safe and cautious and all that stuff. -- Stewart Smith (stewart@linux.org.au) Committee Member, Linux Australia
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part