Re: [Linux-aus] LA ctte meeting summary 2005/02/13

["Christopher Yeoh" <cyeoh@samba.org>]

At 2005/2/22 11:56+1100  Jeff Waugh writes:
> 
>  * A rotational conference would mean throwing out the "best proposal wins"
>    method we're using at the moment, and result in lower quality events run
>    by teams who didn't have to prove their mettle. I'd predict that after a
>    few bum conferences, we'd end up choosing a reliable, distributed team,
>    but they would suffer from burn out, lack of inspiration, and most of
>    them wouldn't be from the host city.

I agree - I don't think a fixed rotation scheme would work
better. Howeverm, it should be seen as a priority that the conference
gets shared around, so as wide a range of people get to attend, and
not just all the same people every year.

Chris
-- 
cyeoh@samba.org