[Linux-aus] Quality of commercial hardware
dennis at ausil.us
Fri Jun 25 13:22:53 UTC 2004
Once upon a time Thursday 24 June 2004 9:13 pm, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> 1. If I accept the refund, I have to go and find another scanner and
> go through the pain of installing either the Microsoft-based stuff
> that they supply (and who knows if it will be any better), or
> SANE, which in the past I have found a real pain.
> 2. It seems that the scanner hardware is fine. All I need is
> information on how to program it, and I can (despite my
> reservations) use SANE.
> 3. I feel that the vendors are getting away too lightly with just
> refunding to people who make enough noise. They should be made to
> fulfil the implied contract.
> I'd be interested in any kind of discussion, including ideas on what
> to replace the scanner with.
i have a cannon LIDE 20 scanner and it works perfect with sane i cant say that
i have done lots with it but i have done enough to know it works well.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Url : http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/attachments/20040625/abafe6f8/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the linux-aus