[Linux-aus] Reaction: SCO case: Australian LUGs says it's a storm in a teacup

Michael Still mikal at stillhq.com
Tue Jun 24 04:45:02 UTC 2003


I am a member of the Canberra LUG, and am intruiged by the comment at the
end of the Age article that CLUG members did not bother to respond to your
article (http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/06/23/1056220519703.html).

Could you please detail the attempts to contact CLUG that you made?

It should be noted that CLUG is an informal group with no President,
committee, or other office bearers. There is no consititution, just
regular meetings (for many years) for like minded individuals.

As I can find no record of an information request going to the appropriate
mailling list (linux at samba.org), perhaps the parting comment in the
article is a little unfair?

Thanks for your time responding,


Michael Still (mikal at stillhq.com) | Stage 1: Steal underpants
http://www.stillhq.com            | Stage 2: ????
UTC + 10                          | Stage 3: Profit

More information about the linux-aus mailing list