[Linux-aus] Did SCO Violate the GPL?

Wed Jun 11 09:48:02 UTC 2003

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Wednesday 11 Jun 2003 11:32 am, Leon Brooks wrote:

>   http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,1123176,00.asp

I've still had no response from SCO about my request for the GPL'd code in the 
Linux kernel (and that was just from a hunch, not from any evidence).

- -- 
 Chris Samuel  :  http://csamuel.org/  :  Melbourne, VIC

 Need someone with 10 years of Linux, Unix, Networking
   & IT Security skills in Melbourne, VIC ? Email me.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBPuaKI41yjaOTJg85AQF6fAf9E8NQylGVp7IQar2PVj7wPD11oOBmZGvI
ALEQ7rFNN8ZMQ0Xk+5mtJG1ZfhbjI4J8a7ITqHtz9Irfnb0OM/XpEMlmwblWSKYL
SPuaWMzvF7+fx8Y/cmiM5SJQBeFFvatn9iAWR2Y62HWiwcNXHm5mIyShPTTOFukR
vc+gxhZx+rdIpeHm9otKdkWjedFsVqCT0qXV2bbe7DkABtm/BcnfUIWAVQDd2kY/
J1t9uZzq3nApanZ42LCvJfVawW3VJZFfc2BRsCWpcrS1+uUYocPhDItcGhx9It8R
Q/zU6sPE1YFl5yWClJk793XUzgtLUnODl2GaxcnoRSCUiO1eBPTMhQ==
=7/pj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----