[Media] [LACTTE] -ve feedback on Twitter re Rusty Wrench - how do we want to handle it?

[Cherie Ellis]

Pia had a good point in that not everyone in the RW cttee may be as closely
involved as needed for this (because life etc).

The idea of the committee putting together nominations from what they see
and hear "on the ground" and as part of the general process, then
submitting options to the RW cttee does mean that it's kept alive.

There may be years when no-one stands out and that's OK too.

Cherie

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Linux Australia Vice President <
vice-president at linux.org.au> wrote:

> Noted, thanks - I won't respond on Twitter.
>
> I saw Pia's email too - perhaps the way forward here is to form a Rusty
> Wrench subcommittee?
>
> --K.
>
>
> On 09/01/17 09:22, Hugh Blemings wrote:
> > Hiya,
> >
> > So a little update on this, Peter Lawler pinged me on IRC on this and
> > we're discussing (well when he replies we will be)
> >
> > I think in terms of a public statement we just let it slide.  For the
> > award lets see what can be accomplished for '17 which at this stage
> > might not be much.
> >
> > The candidate he wants to put forward is a good one I think, but will
> > respect the privacy of all concerned.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Hugh
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > committee mailing list
> > committee at lists.linux.org.au
> > http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/committee
>
> _______________________________________________
> committee mailing list
> committee at lists.linux.org.au
> http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/committee
>



-- 
Cherie Ellis
+64 21 293 9746
<http://govhack.org.nz>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/media/attachments/20170109/c17d30d0/attachment-0001.html>