[Linux-aus] Name change election results..

[Silvia Pfeiffer]

+1

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:55 PM, James Purser <jamesrpurser at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:39 PM, John Ferlito <johnf at inodes.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 03:39:05PM +1100, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>> > In the interest of fairness, I would therefore suggest to go forward
>> with
>> > the second round of voting on a "new name" in which the top three (or
>> maybe
>> > four) names) are set as choice, which includes "LA". This will then
>> give a
>> > much fairer statement of whether the community actually does want to
>> keep
>> > the old name.
>> >
>> > Otherwise we will always have the question hanging around about "what if
>> > the voting process had been different...".
>>
>> Since we are in the middle of an election I wonder if this is best
>> left to the newly elected council to make a decision on.
>>
>> I wouldn't mind seeing a couple of +1's -1's on this to help the
>> council decide where the community stands.
>>
>> So, should the current council hold another Member DB election with new
>> questions something along the lines of.
>>
>> 1. Do you thing LA should change it's name Yes/No
>> 2. Please rank the following names
>>
>> Cheers,
>> John
>>
>> --
>> John
>> Blog                             http://www.inodes.org
>> LCA2013                          http://linux.conf.au
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-aus mailing list
>> linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au
>> http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus
>>
>
>
>
> --
> James Purser
> Collaborynth
> http://collaborynth.com.au
> Mob: +61 406 576 553
> Wave: james at collaborynth.com.au
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/attachments/20130103/95e3d11c/attachment.htm