[Linux-aus] Name change election results..

[James Purser]

+1


On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:39 PM, John Ferlito <johnf at inodes.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 03:39:05PM +1100, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> > In the interest of fairness, I would therefore suggest to go forward with
> > the second round of voting on a "new name" in which the top three (or
> maybe
> > four) names) are set as choice, which includes "LA". This will then give
> a
> > much fairer statement of whether the community actually does want to keep
> > the old name.
> >
> > Otherwise we will always have the question hanging around about "what if
> > the voting process had been different...".
>
> Since we are in the middle of an election I wonder if this is best
> left to the newly elected council to make a decision on.
>
> I wouldn't mind seeing a couple of +1's -1's on this to help the
> council decide where the community stands.
>
> So, should the current council hold another Member DB election with new
> questions something along the lines of.
>
> 1. Do you thing LA should change it's name Yes/No
> 2. Please rank the following names
>
> Cheers,
> John
>
> --
> John
> Blog                             http://www.inodes.org
> LCA2013                          http://linux.conf.au
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-aus mailing list
> linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au
> http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus
>



-- 
James Purser
Collaborynth
http://collaborynth.com.au
Mob: +61 406 576 553
Wave: james at collaborynth.com.au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/attachments/20130103/c7d41c33/attachment.htm