[LC++]g++ 3.2 and C++ standards

Kresimir Fresl fresl at grad.hr
Fri Nov 8 06:28:01 UTC 2002

Carlo Wood wrote:

> 3.2 is comforming to the standard, 2.96 is not in many many ways.
> If your code doesn't compile with 3.2 then it is not conforming
> to the C++ standard.

But, as Mr. Beaudoin `` would like it to compile with compilers like
Borland and M.....ft'', it is much much better that his code ``is not
conforming to the C++ standard'' ;o) ;o)


More information about the tuxCPProgramming mailing list