[LC++]g++ 3.2 and C++ standards

Carlo Wood carlo at alinoe.com
Thu Nov 7 04:03:01 UTC 2002

On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 02:12:42PM -0500, Jack Lloyd wrote:
> Well, maybe. 3.2 has a lot o' bugs, and there are valid ISO C++ programs
> (mostly ones doing really obscure things) that 3.2 can't deal with.
> However, in general 3.2 is much more standards-conformant than 2.96 was.

I disagree, 3.2 has a lot less bugs than 2.96.  And *certainly*
3.2 can compile everything 2.96 can - so, if you run into a problem
with 3.2 (like that the compile crashes) then you most likely are
dealing with code that 2.96 doesn't compile at all.

Carlo Wood <carlo at alinoe.com>

More information about the tuxCPProgramming mailing list