[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [LC++]enum, #define, const, static const, or member const???

To: tuxcpprogramming@lists.linux.org.au
Subject: Re: [LC++]enum, #define, const, static const, or member const???
From: David Lloyd <lloy0076@rebel.net.au>
Date: Wed Apr 10 08:14:04 2002
List-Archive: <http://lists.linux.org.au/archives/tuxcpprogramming/>
List-Help: <mailto:tuxcpprogramming-request@lists.linux.org.au?subject=help>
List-Id: The Linux C++ Programming List <tuxcpprogramming.lists.linux.org.au>
List-Post: <mailto:tuxcpprogramming@lists.linux.org.au>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/tuxcpprogramming>,<mailto:tuxcpprogramming-request@lists.linux.org.au?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/tuxcpprogramming>,<mailto:tuxcpprogramming-request@lists.linux.org.au?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <B14C9D7F1977D111AD740060970ACBDAD42A45@warhol>
Reply-To: tuxcpprogramming@lists.linux.org.au
Sender: tuxcpprogramming-admin@lists.linux.org.au

I don't often interfere, but do we *have* to have HTML e-mail AND text
e-mail? This little black duck works over a 28.8k link and it's
*painful*...

;-)

References:
- RE: [LC++]enum, #define, const, static const, or member const???
  - From: Vincent Penquerc'h <Vincent.Penquerch@artworks.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: [LC++]enum, #define, const, static const, or member const???
Next by Date: RE: [LC++]enum, #define, const, static const, or member const???
Prev by thread: Re: [LC++]enum, #define, const, static const, or member const???
Next by thread: RE: [LC++]enum, #define, const, static const, or member const???
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread