[LC++]Pure Virtual Functions and Derived Classes
Shaul Karl
shaulka at bezeqint.net
Mon Apr 29 17:21:04 UTC 2002
> Is is true that where you have a pure virtual function in a base class,
> your derived classes _must_ contain a definition of that virtual
> function? Sample code:
>
> class alpha
> {
> private:
> int x;
> public:
> alpha() {x = 0;}
> virtual void increment();
> virtual void decrement();
> virtual void turn_sideways() = 0;
> };
>
> class bravo : public alpha
> {
> public:
> void increment() { x += 1; }
> void decrement() { x -= 1; }
> // notice no reference to turn_sideways()
> };
>
>
>
> Paul
>
A class containing (or inheriting) one or more pure virtual
functions is recognized as an abstract base class by the compiler.
An attempt to create an independent class object of an abstract
base class results in a compile-time error.
Taken from `The C++ primer', 3rd edition, page 927.
--
Shaul Karl
email: shaulka(replace with the at - @ - character)bezeqint.net
More information about the tuxCPProgramming
mailing list