[LC++]temporals objects

[Mark Phillips]

Roberto Diaz wrote:

> void push_back (OtherClass *);

You say you want to define push_back this way so that you can
do:

> OtherClass b;
> a.push_back(&b);

But why would you want this?  Why not just do:

OtherClass b;
a.push_back(b);

?

Are you wanting to store pointers to objects rather than objects?  If
so, what part of your program is in charge of creating and maintaining
the actual objects?

Cheers,

Mark.