[Linux-aus] strange NVMe errors when USB is busy
Russell Coker
russell at coker.com.au
Mon Jan 27 15:56:56 AEDT 2025
On Monday, 27 January 2025 12:22:06 AEDT Steven Ellis via linux-aus wrote:
> Is there a chance that the USB is on the same overall BUS as the PCIe of
> the affected NVMe?
I've attached the output of "lspci -t".
0d:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Sandisk Corp WD PC SN810 / Black SN850
NVMe SSD (rev 01)
00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation C610/X99 series chipset USB xHCI
Host Controller (rev 05)
01:00.4 USB controller: Hewlett-Packard Company Integrated Lights-Out Standard
Virtual USB Controller (rev 03)
The above seems to be the relevant lines from "lspci". How do I determine how
close these things are to each other in topology?
--
My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/
-------------- next part --------------
-+-[0000:00]-+-00.0
| +-01.0-[0a]--+-00.0
| | \-00.1
| +-01.1-[13]--
| +-02.0-[03]--+-00.0
| | \-00.1
| +-02.1-[14]--
| +-02.2-[15]--
| +-02.3-[16]--
| +-03.0-[06-09]----00.0-[07-09]--+-03.0-[08]----00.0
| | \-07.0-[09]----00.0
| +-03.1-[0d]----00.0
| +-03.2-[10]----00.0
| +-03.3-[17]--
| +-04.0
| +-04.1
| +-04.2
| +-04.3
| +-04.4
| +-04.5
| +-04.6
| +-04.7
| +-05.0
| +-05.1
| +-05.2
| +-05.4
| +-05.6
| +-11.0
| +-14.0
| +-1c.0-[18]--
| +-1c.2-[01]--+-00.0
| | +-00.2
| | \-00.4
| +-1c.4-[02]--+-00.0
| | \-00.1
| +-1f.0
| \-1f.3
\-[0000:ff]-+-0b.0
+-0b.1
+-0b.2
+-0b.5
+-0c.0
+-0c.1
+-0c.2
+-0c.3
+-0c.4
+-0c.5
+-0c.6
+-0c.7
+-0d.0
+-0d.1
+-0d.2
+-0d.3
+-0d.4
+-0d.5
+-0d.6
+-0d.7
+-0e.0
+-0e.1
+-0f.0
+-0f.1
+-0f.2
+-0f.3
+-0f.4
+-0f.5
+-0f.6
+-10.0
+-10.1
+-10.5
+-10.6
+-10.7
+-12.0
+-12.1
+-12.2
+-12.4
+-12.5
+-12.6
+-13.0
+-13.1
+-13.2
+-13.3
+-13.6
+-13.7
+-14.0
+-14.1
+-14.2
+-14.3
+-14.4
+-14.5
+-14.6
+-14.7
+-15.0
+-15.1
+-16.0
+-16.1
+-16.2
+-16.3
+-16.6
+-16.7
+-17.0
+-17.1
+-17.2
+-17.3
+-17.4
+-17.5
+-17.6
+-17.7
+-1e.0
+-1e.1
+-1e.2
+-1e.3
+-1e.4
+-1f.0
\-1f.2
More information about the linux-aus
mailing list