[Linux-aus] PSA: Messages sent through LA mailing lists being classified as SPAM
Joel W. Shea
jwshea at gmail.com
Fri Jan 15 01:29:49 AEDT 2016
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:13:51AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:09:59 PM Joel W. Shea wrote:
> [...] dmarc_moderation_action means that you will have 2 styles of
> message being sent out and enough of them will be modified that people
> who's MUAs can't thread such messages will have almost every thread
I'm not sure how that would be an issue, since the MUA would be creating
threads from one or more of the following fields;
``Subject'', ``In-Reply-To'' and ``References''
So it shouldn't matter if you've munged the ``From´´ field.
> > Do you still need to re-write the From: header just to sign a
> > message?
> No. But if you want to have DMARC pass then you have to do it.
Sure, but there was no mention of LA publishing a DMARC policy.
> [...] The fact that you advocate for dmarc_moderation_action indicates
> that you don't really believe in sticking to that RFC issue.
I've also advocated rejecting the message, or accepting, thus allowing
the receiver to quarantine/reject the message, and would be my personal
However, you're right that I'd much rather see dmarc_moderation, than
from_as_list; because I really don't appreciate my "From:" field being
unnecessarily rewritten, especially if it causes my own Reply-To field
to be clobbered.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the linux-aus