[Linux-aus] Re-igniting the Membership Committee
_ at chrisjrn.com
Wed Feb 10 12:47:05 AEDT 2016
On 10 February 2016 at 12:40, Tony Breeds <tony at bakeyournoodle.com> wrote:
> At this point my only comment is that subcommittee_policy_v2  may be
> slightly burdensome for this activity. I'd recommend v1 . The decisions is
> of course up to whomever ends up being on the sub-committee.
> I admit that my observation is tangential to collecting expressions of interest
> but I've said it now ....
>>  http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/2015-January/021988.html
>>  http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/2015-January/021995.html
>>  http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/2015-January/022016.html
>>  https://github.com/linuxaustralia/constitution_and_policies/blob/master/subcommittee_policy_v2.md
>  https://github.com/linuxaustralia/constitution_and_policies/blob/master/subcommittee_policy_v1.md
As the author of v2, I echo this sentiment. v2 is designed for
recurring events with budgets, v1 remains suitable for committees that
do not incur a budget.
Jabber: chrisjrn at gmail.com -- IRC: chrisjrn on irc.freenode.net --
WWW: http://chrisjrn.com -- Twitter: @chrisjrn
More information about the linux-aus