[Linux-aus] LA Name Change - the process
brent.wallis at gmail.com
Fri Jul 13 16:31:18 EST 2012
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Bianca Gibson <
bianca.rachel.gibson at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12 July 2012 11:46, Gary Allpike <gary at allpikes.com.au> wrote:
> PS: As the person that first registered the entity “Linux Australia” – It
>> was a Western Australian Registered business name to facilitate the running
>> of CALU before the organisation was registered in NSW – If you don’t want
>> it any more I’m more than happy to have it back!!
> Damn...I claimed dibs in the first few posts ... but recognise and bow to
your "firstness foo... "
This was brought up in the previous discussion, if there is a name change
> then <new name> would retain the LA name.
That really sux...you don't like it but want to keep it.
I would call that squatting!
How about this as an alternative:
How bout if those that think the LA name is bad for them just run off and
start their own org?
IMHO there is a pathetic and frankly sickening political agenda at play
here specifically designed to elicit extreme response that can be pointed
to as being "anti open whatever" . Seems some just want to ride the back of
and crush ...what has been and will continue to be a successful
org....called LINUX AUSTRALIA.
In short, I call on those that are buzzing out this name change
spin/script/meme/"pointy at the constitution wanky" just go and play with
their own toys!
Set up your own org, spend your own time and effort to create what you want.
Leave LA alone!
Stop the hijack!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the linux-aus