[Linux-aus] What is LA's response to UEFI Secure Boot?
matthew.lye at ubuntu.com
Sun Aug 5 08:22:49 EST 2012
Wasn't this done a year ago?
Leadership is responsibility, not privilege, Action, not position,
Guidance, not knowledge, and outcome, not disposition.
<No trees were harmed during this transmission. However, a great number of
electrons were terribly inconvenienced>
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Brent Wallis <brent.wallis at gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi to All,
> What is our collective response to UEFI and secure boot?
> Canonical and RH have taken a position.
> The FSF seem to have taken an opposing view.
> Is it true?
> Could we be facing a situation where we could be locked out of a Linux
> install on current and future PC/ Laptop hardware?
> What impact will this have on servers systems?
> linux-aus mailing list
> linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the linux-aus