[Linux-aus] Seeking nomination
david at davidnewall.com
Sun Dec 23 07:45:09 UTC 2007
Andrew Pam wrote:
> David Newall wrote:
>> I believe that Stallman holds that after being bought and sold just once,
>> software must thenceforth be free; he is wrong.
> That's not my understanding of his expressed views. What leads you to
> this interpretation?
He said something very like that at an AUUG conference in the '90s.
>> Patent provides a completely different class of protection than
>> copyright. Somebody can spend years inventing a really clever
>> algorithm, and rightly would want to be rewarded for that.
> Scientific discovery is always based on the work of those who have gone
> before, not carried out in a vacuum. Holding back the entire industry
> for twenty years (!) during which others are almost certain to
> independently rediscover the same techniques but be barred from using
> them seems like a poor outcome for the industry, the public and indeed
> for software developers, who surely rely heavily on existing algorithms
> even when they have discovered patentable algorithms themselves.
Yes, it does. That's an oft repeated criticism with patents, be they
for software of hardware. I hope nobody will hold flaws in the patent
system against me! I promise that I don't make the rules. :-)
More information about the linux-aus