On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 15:10 +1000, Andrew Cowie wrote: > James, you're missing a bet. Paying for a valued service is one thing. > Value for membership is another - which is one of the reasons most > people can't fathom why they should pay ACS $300 a year. > > AfC > Sydney Hi Andrew, I wasn't thinking of raising fees for all LA memberships, cos that would Stupid(tm). I was thinking more along the lines a "professional" membership type. What services would be included in such a membership product? Should we be even looking at such a thing? What I am trying to do is get a better idea of what people expect or would like to get out of LA. Just to clarify, any professional membership would be entirely voluntary, and would not carry any more benefits in terms of voting etc than the standard $0 membership. It would however allow the "professional" member access to certain services/products, things that would cost mullah to produce/deliver and hence need a steady income stream to support. -- James Purser Producer/Presenter - Open Source On The Air A LocalFOSS Production http://www.localfoss.org irc: #localfoss on irc.freenode.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part