[Linux-aus] Australian Digital Civil Rights Quiz
Nathan.Bailey at its.monash.edu
Wed Jun 21 13:01:01 UTC 2006
I'm not much of a stats buff, but I get the impression that the value of
packages like R <URL:http://www.r-project.org/> (and SAS, SPSS, Matlab,
etc.) is in the scripts/analyses built on top of the basic tool. In
this case, it is quite possible that:
a) Proprietary tools lock in scripts to reduce portability (= lock in costs)
b) Proprietary tools require non-standard scripting language/approach (=
lack of economies of scale in skills/knowledge)
c) Proprietary tools may have plug-ins that can't be ported to other tools
(a) and (c) are particularly relevant to DRM -- if I am not legally
allowed to work out how to migrate my scripts, or a script set I bought,
then my own IP is being restricted by the DRM.
(i.e. equivalent to MS Office proprietary formats not being allowed to
be reverse engineered for portability [which isn't the case now, AFAIK,
but was less clear in earlier days of their EULA])
Janet Hawtin wrote:
> Glen Turner wrote:
>> Hi Janet,
>> I'm not arguing against the substance of what you wrote.
>> <nit picking>
>>> - statistical data modelling
>> Not a good example. I don't understand how Excel works, but I
>> know its stats functions are crap because there is an external
>> standard to test them against. Equally I know the functions in
>> SAS are brilliant. Both are closed source.
>> There is a question about the rights inherent in a data model,
>> especially those used in public policy, but again that is an
>> important fight for others.
> OK fair enough.
> I suggested it after looking at the kinds of
> life/environment/economic/disaster modelling applications people are
> proposing for use to examine environmental impact, project safety and
> viability. If someone DRMs that software and public policy decisions are
> made based on it, I would expect it to conflict with public information
> rights that people have as to whether the information supporting a
> government decsion was well founded or balanced or even relevant. There
> is a risk that policy could be made based on modelling applications with
> nice bling and gui but with ineffective or customised information being
> output and no access to the logic.
> linux-aus mailing list
> linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au
More information about the linux-aus