On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 13:30 +0800, Leon Brooks wrote: > On Friday 06 January 2006 13:27, Karin Purser wrote: > > Has anyone else noticed this phenomenon or am I going nuts? > > IIRC, it's a deliberate policy to even out the candidates' exposure. It's actually not deliberate at all - results are returned in the order they are fetched from the database. This, of course, means that the order is semi-predictable in theory. In practice, not so much. Random ordering could be a good thing however... thoughts from the floor? -- Stewart Smith (stewart@linux.org.au) Committee Member, Linux Australia
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part