[Linux-aus] Changing Order of Nominees

[Stewart Smith]

On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 13:30 +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
> On Friday 06 January 2006 13:27, Karin Purser wrote:
> > Has anyone else noticed this phenomenon or am I going nuts?
> 
> IIRC, it's a deliberate policy to even out the candidates' exposure.

It's actually not deliberate at all - results are returned in the order
they are fetched from the database. This, of course, means that the
order is semi-predictable in theory. In practice, not so much.

Random ordering could be a good thing however... thoughts from the
floor?
-- 
Stewart Smith (stewart at linux.org.au)
Committee Member, Linux Australia
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/attachments/20060109/5f7dd436/attachment-0001.pgp