[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Linux-aus] Re: [Osia-discuss] [Fwd: Re: [xxxxxxx] FW: Re: S.A. Parliament - Ubuntu Matter of Interest]



Brenda,

ps janet you'd recognise the start of this since you sent the orginal request for comment (below) from Dennis Hood to the linuxsa list - just shows it gets around doesnt it :)

Who wrote this one because my first three responses would invoke Godwin's Law...


 * http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/legends/godwin/

Let me just say that I find it very neo-conservative...

++++++++++++++++

"My one cent worth on open source software......

Open source software is not really free as Matt said. The cost of free open source software is migration, maintenance and reliability issues. That is why it is currently used mostly for running non-critical or highly expensive infrastructure (which require less reliability). So it remains largely with enthusiasts and much of the commercial use is found to be delivering non critical web content, internet services and other non critical internet-related services. These are only the areas where level of reliability of free open source software is good enough to be used. Where more reliable services are required, it is more of Unix flavours which are more often used than Linux. There are plenty of GUI's which work well with Unix or any Linux versions used at the backend. So the most used server have Unix/Linux flavours and destop level softwares are either Novell or Microsoft or even legacy DOS used in some countries. To replace an operating system there are some main areas whihc need first attention when migrating to open source software. Costs include change of hardware, retraining staff, additional expert maintenance staff, buying online support 24/7, design and
implementation of addtional redundancy to have 100% backup in case of
breakdown. This is why the Sun software (I am taking this only as a
successful business model example) with its well designed GUI has been made free and they are selling training and support for princely sums. Everybody has a right to make money.... Don't They? How much is the question. The proponent of open source software does make a business case before switching to open source and also have to keep in mind the longevity of such change.
Availability of expertise and also cost effectively will be a major factor in such decisions. So if anyone is a policy maker who reads this email should do more research into such decisions regarding open software.


Also.... each flavour of Unix/Linux is different and some are more reliable in some areas than others. This demands careful planning when switching and planning its long time support. Each business/organisation has different operational procedures and may need different scale of reliability and operational flexibility in the operation of its computer systems, which will also affect the choice of software used.
Unfortunately Microsoft has set the path for unreliable and inefficient
software writing...... Well, we shall feel this for a long time to come,
even in open source software development.


+++++++++++++++++++++++++

DSL