[Linux-aus] Uniting Linux - good or bad?

[Jon maddog Hall]

anarchisttomato at yahoo.com.au said:
> I'm sure we all remember the awful attempt at United Linux which strayed far
> from the Linux ethic,

Just as the LSB tries to make things easier for the ISV, United Linux was
trying to make things easier for the hardware vendors.

Currently each hardware vendor has to test installation of each distribution
across all the hardware they wish to support.  This becomes a very big task,
and very expensive, which explains why companies like IBM and HP only want to
officially support Red Hat and SuSE/Novell.

United Linux was an attempt to fix this problem by using exactly the same
boot path/installation code for all distributions.  This would have reduced the
work tremendously, and allowed even more distributions (not less) to flourish.

The concept was good, but the implementation path was hurried, restricted and
poor.

md
-- 
Jon "maddog" Hall
Executive Director           Linux International(R)
email: maddog at li.org         80 Amherst St. 
Voice: +1.603.672.4557       Amherst, N.H. 03031-3032 U.S.A.
WWW: http://www.li.org

Board Member: Uniforum Association, USENIX Association

(R)Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in several countries.
(R)Linux International is a registered trademark in the USA used pursuant
   to a license from Linux Mark Institute, authorized licensor of Linus
   Torvalds, owner of the Linux trademark on a worldwide basis
(R)UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group in the USA and other
   countries.