We have not only listened to your criticism, we've responded to it - just about all committee members at some point have (check the archives - not that you EVER WILL). Not only that - but many HIGHLY RESPECTED members of the community also have. You've made a habit of not reading or understanding peoples replies, talking crap (that could easily have been corrected if you did ANYTHING that was suggested - such as read mail archives, read meeting minutes - or hell, even ASKED in a POLITE and CONSTRUCTIVE manner). Even when people explicitly pointed out WHERE YOU WERE WRONG and gave REFERENCES and COUNTER-EXAMPLES you just seemed to want to argue and have needless stupid debate of insignificant little pointless things. Dammit - I even sort of STOOD UP for you when a LOT of people wanted you OFF THE LIST - I said I was nervous about throwing people off it. But now all you've done is make me wish I hadn't - you just have not grown up - in fact, I've met 6 year olds with a better sense of logic and maturity. so, i end in quoting Jeff, "Learn to read, listen and be constructive, or disappear, please." A person who has given you more than your fair share of his time - as have I. We've listened, taken in and responded to everything you've said - but you don't want to admit it. So go away, do everybody here a favour. Come back when you have learnt to read, be constructive or well, anything. Oh, final note - I wouldn't vote for you even if someone had a gun to my head telling me to. On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 14:57, Bret Busby wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Stewart Smith wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:32:36 +1100 > > From: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.org.au> > > To: Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> > > Cc: linux-aus <linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au> > > Subject: Re: [Linux-aus] Re: [LACTTE] Constitution Version 6 - Last one! > > > > You are an idiot. > > > > That comes from a person that I would not want in any postition of any > responsibility. > > What confidence can be held, in such people who use the organisation's > resources for broadcasting such messages? > > How are people expected to regard the committee, when the committee > members so act? And, how are people to regard people who act with such > irresponsibility and immaturity? > > So much for Linux Australia. -- Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.org.au> Linux Australia Inc
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part