On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 16:15, Leon Brooks wrote: > I'd like to see Jeff elected to Committee in particular because he's got > a lot of energy and because we disagree on stuff. Variety is the spice > of life. (-: Yeah - lots of energy and no pants. A winning combination. I want to see that on a business card one day :) > Out of the blue, I'd also like to float the idea (no obligation) of > seconding a few of the runners-up into Committee after election so we > have enough people readily available to assign enough tasks to to leave > more energy for productivity after dealing with the reasonably constant > level of administrivia. It would also leave room for equity issues for > portfolio-style voting, that is, you could vote for somebody who will > support your special interest without necessarily risking the loss of a > high-quality stabiliser like Tridge. How do you feel about that? > Comments? One thing I'd really like to see is all those people who have nominated to get involved in LA - if they are voted in or not. It's a great way to help get things done, get involved, and increase your chances of getting voted in next year (people like doers - or at least they *should*). Plus - getting credit for your work is something I love (see previous "rock on" mail). So please, please please - get involved, credit will be given and you can feel warm and fuzzy - plus, it's cool. rock on all! -- Stewart Smith (stewart@linux.org.au) Vice President, Linux Australia
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part