[Linux-aus] Re: [LACTTE] Constitution Version 6 - Last one!

[Stewart Smith]

We have not only listened to your criticism, we've responded to it -
just about all committee members at some point have (check the archives
- not that you EVER WILL). Not only that - but many HIGHLY RESPECTED
members of the community also have.

You've made a habit of not reading or understanding peoples replies,
talking crap (that could easily have been corrected if you did ANYTHING
that was suggested - such as read mail archives, read meeting minutes -
or hell, even ASKED in a POLITE and CONSTRUCTIVE manner).

Even when people explicitly pointed out WHERE YOU WERE WRONG and gave
REFERENCES and COUNTER-EXAMPLES you just seemed to want to argue and
have needless stupid debate of insignificant little pointless things.

Dammit - I even sort of STOOD UP for you when a LOT of people wanted you
OFF THE LIST - I said I was nervous about throwing people off it. But
now all you've done is make me wish I hadn't - you just have not grown
up - in fact, I've met 6 year olds with a better sense of logic and
maturity.

so, i end in quoting Jeff,

"Learn to read, listen and be constructive, or disappear, please."

A person who has given you more than your fair share of his time - as
have I. We've listened, taken in and responded to everything you've said
- but you don't want to admit it. So go away, do everybody here a
favour.

Come back when you have learnt to read, be constructive or well,
anything.

Oh, final note - I wouldn't vote for you even if someone had a gun to my
head telling me to.

On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 14:57, Bret Busby wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Stewart Smith wrote:
> 
> > Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:32:36 +1100
> > From: Stewart Smith <stewart at linux.org.au>
> > To: Bret Busby <bret at busby.net>
> > Cc: linux-aus <linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au>
> > Subject: Re: [Linux-aus] Re: [LACTTE] Constitution Version 6 - Last one!
> > 
> > You are an idiot.
> > 
> 
> That comes from a person that I would not want in any postition of any 
> responsibility.
> 
> What confidence can be held, in such people who use the organisation's 
> resources for broadcasting such messages?
> 
> How are people expected to regard the committee, when the committee 
> members so act? And, how are people to regard people who act with such 
> irresponsibility and immaturity?
> 
> So much for Linux Australia.
-- 
Stewart Smith <stewart at linux.org.au>
Linux Australia Inc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/attachments/20040108/2b927ffb/attachment-0001.pgp