[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Linux-aus] And now for something completely different



 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bret,

I just don't get you.

For a moment there I thought you were going to actually start
behaving like a human being and contribute something of value.

But alas, no, it was not to be.  Your inner vitriol boiled over once
again and you behaved like a tosser in a public forum.

I would like to ask you to publicly state your agenda and what you
are trying to achieve with your nasty snide attacks.

If you need some examples of you being a tosser (I am assuming that
you act out of ignorance and not sheer malice), try looking at this:

- -----
And the converse.

Someone should write down all the reasons why they want Linux
Australia 
to not represent Australia.

- -- 
Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia
- -----

I would suggest that in the case you are not able to fathom any of
this you may wish to seek some professional assistance in doing so.

regards


Gary Allpike
spice@spice.net.au
Speaking for myself, and my dog.  All flames to be directed to the
dog.



- -----Original Message-----
From: linux-aus-admin@lists.linux.org.au
[mailto:linux-aus-admin@lists.linux.org.au] On Behalf Of Bret Busby
Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2003 6:36 PM
To: Linux Australia List
Subject: Re: [Linux-aus] And now for something completely different


On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Anand Kumria wrote:

> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 20:45:07 +1100
> From: Anand Kumria <wildfire@progsoc.uts.edu.au>
> Reply-To: linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au
> To: Bret Busby <bret@busby.net>
> Cc: Linux Australia List <linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au>
> Subject: Re: [Linux-aus] And now for something completely different
> 
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 05:17:45PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> > 
> > Perhaps, if the committee is sincere, it could consider a
> > regional 
>            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> > representation model, and try to implement it, with new
> > membership  and
> > elections in about six months (should be sufficient to implement
> > it, so  it is done in plenty of time before the next AGM.
> 
> And you wonder why people aren't interested in commenting on your 
> suggestions when you come out with such inflammatory comments.
> 
> > And, online discussion, without the acrimony that has opccurred
> > in  the
> > past, with as many of the Linux community as possible in
> > Australia,  involved, would be a good start.
> 
> Perhaps you could start being less acrimonious then.
> 
> Anand
> 
> 

Here we go aagin!!

Prithee; what is either inflammatory or acrimonious in what I said?

Unless the status quo is to be preserved at all costs, and without 
regard for anything else, apart from preserving the status quo.

It all does back to the issue of what the organisation is supposed to
represent, if you want all of that raised again.

- -- 
Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia
..............

"So once you do know what the question actually is,
 you'll know what the answer means."
- - Deep Thought,
  Chapter 28 of 
  "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:
  A Trilogy In Four Parts",
  written by Douglas Adams, 
  published by Pan Books, 1992 
....................................................

_______________________________________________
linux-aus mailing list
linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au
http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBPj+dbDlc1AUgH4tFEQIThgCfZAxcWTH0pRzUpvjcpn4HOsydmRUAn1wb
lLLnshWu3B+oLjGWIls2QCy9
=zSC5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----